Claim Your Free Listing on MyDrugTesting.com, No Credit Card Required. Claim Your Profile.

Back to Agency Updates
USDAAMS
  • ByLearn Laws®
  • Published08/03/2026
  • Updated08/03/2026

USDA Seeks Extension for Crucial Tobacco Market Data Collection Amidst Evolving Industry Landscape


The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is moving to extend a critical information collection instrumental in understanding the nation's tobacco market. This action, formally announced in the Federal Register on Monday, August 3, 2026, signals the agency's intent to request approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for an extension and revision of the 'Tobacco Report' (OMB No. 0581-0004).

This notice, bearing document number AMS-TB-26-1057, underscores the USDA's ongoing commitment to collecting and disseminating vital statistics on agricultural products. The public has until October 2, 2026, to submit comments on this proposed extension, which directly impacts tobacco dealers, manufacturers, and the broader industry.

Mandate for Data Collection

The foundation for this data collection lies in two key pieces of federal legislation. The Tobacco Statistics Act of 1929 (7 U.S.C. 501-508) empowers the USDA to collect and publish statistics regarding quantities of leaf tobacco in all forms held by dealers, manufacturers, and other entities in the United States and Puerto Rico, excluding original growers. This Act ensures that the inventory information about various tobacco products is reported on a quarterly basis, specifically as of January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 each year. These mandatory reports are due within 15 days of those dates.

Supplementing this, the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627) authorizes the USDA to collect, tabulate, and disseminate statistics on a wide array of agricultural marketing aspects, including market supplies, storage stocks, product quality and condition, utilization of sub-products, and shipments. Together, these statutes provide the legal framework for the comprehensive 'Tobacco Report' collection.

The Information Collection Process

The 'Tobacco Report' gathers two primary types of data. The first is a mandatory collection of unmanufactured tobacco stocks. This includes leaf tobacco and stems, categorized by type, and whether it is stemmed or unstemmed. Tobacco in sheet form is further segregated by its intended use, such as for cigar wrappers, binders, cigarettes, or other products. The core purpose of this mandatory collection is to ascertain the total supply of unmanufactured tobacco available to domestic manufacturers and to calculate the amount consumed in manufactured tobacco products.

The second component, the 'Quarterly Report of Manufacture and Sales of Snuff, Smoking and Chewing Tobacco,' is voluntary. While the Treasury Department collects data on these products for tax purposes, the AMS report offers a more detailed breakdown desired by the industry. Historically, all major tobacco manufacturers have agreed to furnish this information to AMS, highlighting its perceived value within the sector.

Crucially, the information gathered is for statistical purposes only. The USDA explicitly states that no publication will identify data from any particular establishment, and only sworn USDA employees are permitted to examine individual reports, ensuring confidentiality as stipulated by the Tobacco Statistics Act.

Estimated Reporting Burden

The AMS has provided an estimate of the public reporting burden associated with this information collection. It is projected to average 0.88 hours per response. The agency anticipates 44 respondents, primarily tobacco dealers and manufacturers, including small businesses or organizations. This translates to an estimated 176 total annual responses and a total annual burden on respondents of 156 hours. These figures are central to the OMB's review process under the Paperwork Reduction Act, which aims to minimize the reporting burden on the public.

Public Comment Opportunity

Recognizing the importance of public input, the AMS is actively soliciting comments on four specific areas:

  1. Necessity and Utility: Whether the proposed collection is necessary for agency functions and possesses practical utility.
  2. Accuracy of Burden Estimate: The validity of the methodology and assumptions used to estimate the reporting burden.
  3. Quality Enhancement: Ways to improve the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected.
  4. Burden Minimization: Methods to reduce the reporting burden on respondents, including the use of automated or electronic techniques.

Comments can be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at regulations.gov or via mail or hand delivery to the Market News Division in Memphis, TN. All submitted comments will become part of the public record and will be summarized and included in the final request for OMB approval.

Analysis of Significance

This routine but vital request for an extension underscores the federal government's role in maintaining transparency and providing foundational market intelligence for the agricultural sector. The 'Tobacco Report' offers a continuous, historical dataset that is indispensable for understanding supply and demand dynamics within the tobacco industry. This data supports economic analyses, informs policy decisions regarding agricultural commodities, and assists businesses in strategic planning.

The review process through the Paperwork Reduction Act ensures that federal agencies continue to collect only necessary information and do so efficiently. The opportunity for public comment allows stakeholders to voice concerns or suggest improvements, ensuring the data collection remains relevant and imposes the least possible burden. The continuation of this report is critical for both government oversight and industry insight, particularly as the tobacco market navigates evolving consumer preferences, regulatory changes, and global trade dynamics. Its objective, factual reporting serves as a steady anchor in an often complex and politicized arena.

Learn More

We are an education company, not a law firm. The information and content we provide is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make no representations, warranties, or guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of the content. It is important to always consult with a qualified attorney for specific legal counsel pertaining to your individual circumstances.

People Also Viewed...

DOT Reasonable Suspicion Training for Supervisors

DOT Reasonable Suspicion Training for Supervisors

$60.00

Non-DOT Reasonable Suspicion Training for Supervisors

Non-DOT Reasonable Suspicion Training for Supervisors

$55.00

Drug-Free Workplace Training for Employees

Drug-Free Workplace Training for Employees

$35.00