Back to Agency Updates
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board
  • By Learn Laws®
  • Published 05/27/2026
  • Updated 05/27/2026

Access Board Seeks Comments on Renewing Online Accessibility Complaint Form: Proposed Changes to Enhance Public Participation and Efficiency


On Wednesday, May 27, 2026, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, commonly known as the Access Board, announced a crucial development for public engagement in federal accessibility enforcement. The agency published a notice in the Federal Register, inviting public comment on the proposed renewal of its Online Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Complaint Form, a vital mechanism enabling individuals to report alleged accessibility barriers at facilities covered by federal law. This move signals the Board's intent to continue and refine a key process for upholding accessibility standards in federally funded constructions and alterations.

Background and Purpose of the ABA Complaint Process

The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (ABA) mandates that buildings and facilities designed, constructed, altered, or leased with federal funds be accessible to individuals with disabilities. The Access Board serves as a primary enforcer of this act, investigating complaints from the public to identify and address non-compliance. The Online ABA Complaint Form, identified by OMB Control Number 3014-0012, is the cornerstone of this enforcement mechanism. It provides a standardized, user-friendly platform for individuals to bring potential violations to the Board's attention. This form has proven highly effective, with more than 90 percent of all ABA complaints received by the Board each year utilizing this digital channel, highlighting its importance for both the public and the agency. The form's availability 24/7 also ensures that complaints can be filed promptly, contributing to greater efficiency in the overall complaint resolution process.

Proposed Enhancements and Burden Adjustments

As part of its renewal process under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the Access Board has outlined several proposed changes to the existing information collection. These changes are designed to reflect current operational realities and improve the complaint submission experience. Notably, the Board proposes to increase the estimated number of annual respondents from 200 to 400. This adjustment acknowledges the consistent rise in public participation, with an average of 300 to 320 complaints received annually over the past three years. This upward revision underscores a growing public awareness and utilization of the complaint mechanism.

Concurrently, the Board plans to reduce the estimated average response time for completing the online form from 30 minutes to 15 minutes. This reduction is based on an internal reassessment of the previous estimate and anticipates the introduction of a more interactive and user-friendly online form. The goal is to streamline the submission process, making it quicker and less burdensome for individuals. Despite the projected doubling of respondents and halving of individual response time, the total estimated annual burden hours for the public remains consistent at 100 hours (400 respondents multiplied by 15 minutes per response equals 100 hours). This indicates a strategic effort to accommodate increased public input without escalating the overall time commitment demanded from the public, signaling an optimized process.

Details of the Complaint Submission Process

The Online ABA Complaint Form requires complainants to provide specific essential information to initiate an investigation. This includes the name of the building or facility in question and its city and state. Crucially, complainants must also describe each specific barrier to accessibility they have encountered or are aware of. While the form offers an option to provide personal details such as name, address, telephone numbers, and email, this information remains optional. The Board explicitly states that personal information, if provided, is not disclosed outside the agency without the complainant's written permission, protecting privacy. Furthermore, the form allows for the upload of electronic files, such as pictures or drawings, which can serve as critical evidence supporting the complaint. Upon successful submission, complainants receive a confirmation and a unique complaint number, facilitating inquiries into the status of their report.

The Paperwork Reduction Act Context

The proposed renewal operates within the framework of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The PRA requires federal agencies to obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for information collections, ensuring that such collections are necessary, have practical utility, and minimize burden on the public. This notice serves as a formal step in that approval process, inviting stakeholders to offer feedback on various aspects of the proposed renewal, including its necessity, practical utility, accuracy of burden estimates, and potential improvements in quality and clarity. The Access Board's adherence to PRA requirements underscores its commitment to transparent and efficient governance.

Implications for Accessibility Advocacy

The renewal of the Online ABA Complaint Form, particularly with the proposed enhancements, carries significant implications for accessibility advocacy. By making the complaint process more accessible and efficient, the Access Board aims to encourage greater public participation. A more streamlined and less time-consuming form could reduce barriers to reporting, potentially leading to an increase in identified violations and, consequently, an improvement in compliance with ABA standards across federally funded facilities. The Board's acknowledgment of increased complaint volume also highlights a proactive approach to managing public input and leveraging it for effective enforcement.

Learn More

We are an education company, not a law firm. The information and content we provide is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make no representations, warranties, or guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of the content. It is important to always consult with a qualified attorney for specific legal counsel pertaining to your individual circumstances.

People Also Viewed...

DOT Reasonable Suspicion Training for Supervisors

$60.00

Non-DOT Reasonable Suspicion Training for Supervisors

$55.00

Drug-Free Workplace Training for Employees

$35.00