Employers are lawfully allowed to implement in-house drug testing programs (with some exceptions) to maintain a safe and drug-free workplace. Compared to outsourcing, in-house drug and alcohol testing can be more efficient and financially beneficial.
Legal and Practical Advantages of On-Site Drug Testing
In-house drug testing provides an immediate and flexible approach to ensuring a drug-free environment in the workplace. It's important to understand the distinction between DOT and non-DOT drug testing:
-
DOT (Department of Transportation) Drug Testing: This pertains to specific regulations the U.S. Department of Transportation sets. It is mandatory for certain safety-sensitive positions, primarily in the transportation industry, such as truck drivers, pilots, and railroad workers. DOT tests have strict protocols regarding the drugs tested for, the testing methods, and how results are reported. If a DOT test result is non-negative (i.e., it may indicate drug use), it must be sent to a SAMHSA-certified laboratory for confirmation testing. This ensures accuracy before any employment action based on the result can be taken.
-
Non-DOT Drug Testing: These tests are not bound by DOT regulations and can be tailored to an organization's needs. While they ensure a safe and productive work environment, they don't have the stringent requirements of DOT tests. Depending on the company's policy, non-DOT tests may or may not need to be sent out for confirmation if they produce a non-negative result.
Drawbacks of Outsourced Drug Testing
Using an external lab can be cumbersome and expensive. It involves coordinating with the lab, incurring service costs, and potentially dealing with timing challenges for post-incident tests. In an accident, for example, waiting for a lab technician to arrive may delay testing, and substances like alcohol might no longer be detectable. After-hours services can also lead to significant additional charges.
Economic and Operational Benefits of In-House Testing
In-house testing, however, addresses these issues. By training existing staff to conduct these tests, you ensure timely results at a fraction of the cost. For instance, running a urine test in-house costs approximately $15 instead of an average of $60 at an external lab. Over time, this difference can result in substantial savings, especially if your company conducts regular screenings.
The lower cost is due to eliminating the need for an on-site technician visit from the lab, which adds to the expense of outsourced services. Also, given the scarcity of these labs, their prices can be pretty high. And once you factor in state-specific protocols and additional procedures, the costs can exceed the base amount.
Immediate Action for Safety
Most importantly, on-site testing facilitates rapid response when safety is concerned. If a test returns positive, immediate steps can be taken to ensure a secure working environment. This level of responsiveness is not achievable with external testing, where waiting for results could pose unnecessary risks.
