• home
  • >
  • blog
  • >
  • USTR Determines Nicaragua's Labor and Human Rights Practices Actionable Under Section 301, Proposes Trade Actions

USTR Determines Nicaragua's Labor and Human Rights Practices Actionable Under Section 301, Proposes Trade Actions

  • By: Learn Laws®
  • Published: 10/23/2025
  • Updated: 10/23/2025

The U.S. Trade Representative has issued a determination under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, finding Nicaragua's acts, policies, and practices related to labor rights, human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law to be unreasonable and burdensome to U.S. commerce. Announced in the Federal Register on October 23, 2025, this notice follows an investigation launched on December 10, 2024, and proposes trade actions such as suspending benefits under the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) and imposing duties up to 100% on Nicaraguan products. The determination highlights systemic issues under the Ortega-Murillo regime, affecting workers, religious groups, and businesses, including U.S. interests. This development marks a significant escalation in U.S. trade policy toward Nicaragua, potentially reshaping bilateral economic relations and regional trade dynamics.

Background of the Investigation

The investigation began with a notice published on December 13, 2024, in the Federal Register (89 FR 101088), initiating proceedings under Section 302(b)(1) of the Trade Act. It targeted Nicaragua's policies on labor rights, human rights, and the rule of law. Over 160 written comments were received, and a public hearing occurred on January 16, 2025, where witnesses testified. The U.S. requested consultations with Nicaragua under Section 303(a), but Nicaragua declined. A comprehensive report by USTR and the Section 301 Committee details the findings, available on USTR's website. This process aligns with statutory requirements for transparency and public input, drawing on submissions from stakeholders including labor groups, human rights organizations, and businesses.

Key players include the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, led by the U.S. Trade Representative, and the Section 301 Committee, chaired by Philip Butler. The Ortega-Murillo regime in Nicaragua is central, accused of pervasive abuses. This investigation fits into broader U.S. efforts to address trade partners' non-compliance with international norms, similar to past Section 301 actions against countries like China for intellectual property issues or Ukraine for piracy concerns.

Details of Nicaragua's Acts, Policies, and Practices

The USTR report outlines abuses in three main areas. On labor rights, the regime represses freedom of association and collective bargaining, interferes in unions, seizes assets, and allows child and forced labor. For instance, the government controls major unions, arresting members and preventing independent organizing. Data indicates 47% of children aged 10-14 are working in sectors like mining and quarrying.

Human rights violations include repression of religious freedoms, such as the 2023 closure and seizure of the Jesuit-run University of Central America and the 2024 arrest of leaders from Nicaragua's largest U.S.-based evangelical church, with property expropriation. These actions affect U.S. persons and properties directly.

The dismantling of rule of law involves arbitrary fines, taxes, and seizures without recourse, including revoking legal status of business organizations. These practices contravene Nicaragua's own laws, constitution, and international commitments, such as conventions on labor rights and human rights treaties.

Determination of Unreasonableness and Burden on U.S. Commerce

Under Sections 301(b) and 304(a) of the Trade Act, the U.S. Trade Representative concluded these practices are unreasonable because they violate norms of fairness, human rights, and rule of law. They contradict international standards Nicaragua has ratified and create unfair competition.

The burden on U.S. commerce arises through worker exploitation leading to low-cost products that undercut U.S. workers, lost sales and investment opportunities due to economic instability, and direct harms like property seizures from U.S. entities. For example, suppressed wages in Nicaragua result in artificially cheap exports, harming U.S. industries. Arbitrary actions create a high-risk environment, deterring U.S. investment and causing economic losses.

This determination reflects advice from the Section 301 Committee and advisory groups, emphasizing evidence from public comments and the hearing.

Proposed Trade Actions

Pursuant to Sections 301(b) and (c), the U.S. Trade Representative proposes suspending all or some CAFTA-DR benefits to Nicaragua, including tariff concessions and content cumulation, either immediately or phased over up to 12 months. Additional options include tariffs up to 100% on all or selected Nicaraguan imports, with phased implementation.

These measures aim to eliminate the offending practices. USTR seeks comments by November 19, 2025, on specifics like timing, sectors, and impacts on U.S. interests, including small businesses and consumers. The proposal invites views on whether actions would effectively pressure Nicaragua or cause disproportionate harm.

Perspectives vary: supporters argue it upholds U.S. values and protects commerce, while critics may highlight potential disruptions to regional trade or effects on Nicaraguan civilians. Short-term implications include higher costs for U.S. importers of Nicaraguan goods like apparel or agricultural products. Long-term, it could encourage reforms in Nicaragua or shift trade patterns within CAFTA-DR.

In conclusion, this Section 301 determination underscores U.S. commitment to linking trade benefits with respect for rights and law. Potential next steps involve reviewing public comments, finalizing actions, and monitoring Nicaragua's response. Ongoing debates may focus on balancing enforcement with humanitarian concerns, while challenges include enforcement efficacy and regional economic ripple effects. Future trajectories could involve diplomatic negotiations or further escalations if practices persist.

Learn More

We are an education company, not a law firm. The information and content we provide is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make no representations, warranties, or guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of the content. It is important to always consult with a qualified attorney for specific legal counsel pertaining to your individual circumstances.

people ask

Need more help? Schedule a Call.

We love our system, and we know you will, too! We’d be happy to explain how our system works, which options you have available, and which of those options would be the most effective and affordable for your budget. We know your time is valuable, so feel free to use the link below to select a time that works best for you or your team to meet with one of our experts.

Book Now Subscribe Now Search Courses