The Department of the Treasury has initiated a process to renew its authority for collecting detailed data on centrally cleared transactions in the U.S. repurchase agreement market. Published in the Federal Register on October 31, 2025, this notice invites public comments on the proposed extension of an information collection originally established in 2019. The move underscores ongoing efforts to bolster oversight of a critical financial market segment that provides short-term funding and influences broader economic stability. By requiring central counterparties to report transaction details daily, the initiative supports the Financial Stability Oversight Council in identifying potential risks and aids in producing alternative benchmark rates amid the phase-out of LIBOR.
Background and Regulatory Foundation
The data collection stems from a 2019 Final Rule issued by the Office of Financial Research within the Treasury Department. This rule was prompted by recommendations from the Financial Stability Oversight Council in its 2016 and 2017 annual reports to Congress. The council highlighted the repurchase agreement market's pivotal role in short-term funding and its vulnerabilities, which could amplify systemic risks if not properly monitored.
Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Office of Financial Research holds authority to gather and standardize financial data to assist the council in fulfilling its duties. Specifically, section 5344(b)(1) of title 12 U.S. Code empowers the office to collect transaction and position data from financial companies. The rulemaking process, as outlined in section 5343(c), required consultation with the council's chairperson, which occurred before the 2019 rule's publication. This legal framework ensures the collection aligns with broader goals of promoting financial stability without overstepping regulatory bounds.
The repurchase agreement market, often called the repo market, involves short-term loans collateralized by securities. Centrally cleared repos are processed through central counterparties, which mitigate counterparty risk by acting as intermediaries. The notice emphasizes that this market's monitoring is essential due to its functions in funding and liquidity provision for U.S. financial systems.
Key Components of the Collection
The proposed renewal, assigned OMB Control Number 1505-0259, seeks an extension without changes to the existing setup. It targets certain U.S. central counterparties for repo transactions, requiring daily reporting via forms OFR SFT 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. The Treasury estimates two respondents, with a frequency of 1,512 annual responses—reflecting daily submissions adjusted for business days—and two hours per response, totaling 3,024 burden hours annually.
This data serves dual purposes. First, it enhances the council's and the office's ability to monitor risks to financial stability by providing daily transaction insights. Second, it supports the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's calculation of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate and the Broad General Collateral Rate. These rates were developed as alternatives to the London Interbank Offered Rate, following the Alternative Reference Rates Committee's selection of SOFR in response to LIBOR's identified fragilities, such as manipulation risks exposed in past scandals.
The notice attributes the initiative's importance to the council's prior recognitions, noting that 'fragilities in LIBOR made the financial system vulnerable to instability.' By facilitating these reference rates, the collection addresses a council recommendation for creating robust benchmarks, thereby linking data gathering to systemic resilience.
Stakeholders and Perspectives
Central counterparties, such as those operated by major clearing houses, are the primary entities affected, bearing the reporting burden. The office shares collected data with the council and its member agencies, including the Federal Reserve, to inform policy and oversight. Public comments are invited until December 1, 2025, via the specified portal, allowing input from industry participants, academics, and other stakeholders.
From a regulatory perspective, proponents view this as a prudent step in post-financial crisis reforms, emphasizing data-driven risk assessment. Critics, however, might argue that ongoing collections impose administrative costs on private entities, potentially stifling market efficiency. Industry groups have historically weighed in on similar rules, balancing the need for transparency against operational burdens. The notice itself does not alter the scope, maintaining a targeted approach to centrally cleared repos rather than the broader bilateral market.
Relevant precedents include the council's annual reports, which consistently advocated for repo data expansion. The LIBOR transition, mandated by global regulators, provides context, with SOFR now underpinning trillions in financial contracts. This collection's role in rate production highlights its intersection with monetary policy, as the Federal Reserve relies on accurate data for effective implementation.
Implications for Financial Stability and Markets
In the short term, renewing this collection ensures continuity in monitoring a market that saw significant stress during events like the 2019 repo spike and the 2020 pandemic-induced turmoil. Access to granular data allows regulators to detect anomalies, such as sudden liquidity shortages, potentially averting broader disruptions.
Longer-term, the initiative contributes to a more resilient financial architecture by supporting LIBOR alternatives. As SOFR gains adoption, the data's quality directly impacts contract reliability and market confidence. However, challenges persist, including the need to adapt to evolving market structures, such as the rise of digital assets or changes in clearing practices.
Different viewpoints emerge on its effectiveness. Some analysts praise the targeted focus on central clearing as a high-impact area for stability gains, while others call for broader coverage to include non-cleared repos for a fuller picture. The notice's emphasis on council duties underscores a collaborative federal approach, yet it raises questions about data privacy and usage, with the office bound by Dodd-Frank confidentiality provisions.
The renewal of this data collection represents a sustained commitment to transparency in the U.S. repo market. Key takeaways include its roots in Dodd-Frank reforms and its support for essential reference rates. Looking ahead, potential next steps involve OMB approval following the comment period, with possible adjustments based on feedback. Ongoing debates may center on expanding the collection's scope or integrating advanced analytics for risk detection, while challenges include balancing regulatory oversight with market innovation. As financial landscapes evolve, such mechanisms will likely remain central to safeguarding stability.
