Legal Implications of Marijuana Rescheduling in the Workplace. Learn More.

  • home
  • >
  • blog
  • >
  • BEA Proposes Raising Threshold for Quarterly Foreign Direct Investment Survey to Reduce Reporting Burden

BEA Proposes Raising Threshold for Quarterly Foreign Direct Investment Survey to Reduce Reporting Burden

  • By: Learn Laws®
  • Published: 01/15/2026
  • Updated: 01/15/2026

The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, announced on January 15, 2026, a proposal to modify the reporting requirements for its quarterly survey on foreign direct investment in the United States. The notice, published in the Federal Register, seeks public comments on increasing the asset threshold for mandatory reporting on Form BE-605 from $60 million to $500 million. This adjustment targets a reduction in administrative burden for smaller affiliates while preserving the integrity of data used in key national economic accounts. The move comes under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, which requires agencies to minimize public reporting burdens. Comments are due by March 16, 2026, ahead of submission to the Office of Management and Budget for approval. This development reflects ongoing efforts to balance data needs with efficiency in federal information collection.

Background on the BE-605 Survey

The BE-605 survey, formally known as the Quarterly Survey of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States--Transactions of U.S. Affiliate with Foreign Parent, collects data on financial transactions and positions between U.S. affiliates and their foreign parent groups. A U.S. affiliate is defined as a business enterprise in which a foreign entity owns at least 10 percent of the voting securities or an equivalent interest. The survey covers quarterly changes in these relationships, including assets, sales, revenues, and net income.

Data from the BE-605 feeds into broader economic indicators, such as the U.S. international transactions accounts, national income and product accounts, and the net international investment position. These statistics help measure the scale and impact of foreign investment on the U.S. economy. For instance, they provide insights into how foreign direct investment influences employment, trade balances, and economic growth. The survey operates as a sample-based collection, with results extrapolated to estimate universe-level figures in non-benchmark years. It complements the more comprehensive BE-12 Benchmark Survey, conducted every five years.

The legal foundation for the BE-605 stems from the International Investment and Trade in Services Survey Act, enacted in 1976 and amended in 1984 and 1990. This act mandates BEA to gather data on international investments to inform policy and economic analysis. Reporting is mandatory for qualifying entities, with exemptions for certain private funds. BEA contacts potential respondents directly, and filings occur electronically via the agency's eFile system or through mailed forms.

Proposed Changes to Reporting Requirements

The core proposal involves raising the valuation threshold for mandatory reporting. Under current rules, a BE-605 form must be filed for any directly owned U.S. affiliate where total assets, annual sales or gross operating revenues (excluding sales taxes), or annual net income after U.S. income taxes exceeds $60 million at any point in the fiscal year. This also applies to indirectly owned affiliates meeting the threshold with an intercompany debt balance.

BEA now suggests increasing this threshold to $500 million. According to the Federal Register notice, this adjustment would maintain sufficient data quality for economic statistics while reducing the number of required respondents. The agency estimates that the change will lower the annual number of respondents from an unspecified current level to about 2,100 per quarter, or 8,400 annually. Each response is projected to take an average of one hour, resulting in a total annual burden of 8,400 hours, with no associated cost to the public.

Amanda Budny, Chief of the Direct Transactions and Positions Branch at BEA, is listed as the contact for further information. The notice emphasizes that the revised threshold was determined after assessing data needs, ensuring that key insights into foreign investment's economic impact remain available.

Implications for Data Collection and Economic Analysis

Raising the threshold could streamline operations for BEA and respondents alike. Smaller affiliates, those below $500 million in the specified metrics, would no longer need to file quarterly reports, potentially saving time and resources. This aligns with the Paperwork Reduction Act's goal of minimizing unnecessary burdens, as highlighted in the notice's request for comments on the collection's necessity, accuracy of burden estimates, and ways to enhance quality.

From an economic perspective, the change might affect the granularity of data on mid-sized foreign investments. However, BEA asserts that the higher threshold will still capture the majority of significant transactions, given that larger affiliates account for a substantial portion of foreign direct investment. Historical data from BEA shows that foreign direct investment in the U.S. reached $5.25 trillion in position terms as of 2022, with major contributors from Europe and Asia. The BE-605's role in tracking quarterly fluctuations is crucial for timely policy responses, such as those related to trade negotiations or investment incentives.

Different stakeholders may view this proposal variably. Businesses and industry groups might welcome the reduced compliance costs, especially for multinational firms with multiple U.S. affiliates. Economists and policymakers, however, could express concerns about potential gaps in data coverage for emerging investment trends. For example, if smaller affiliates represent growing sectors like technology startups, their exclusion might skew aggregate statistics. The notice invites feedback on these aspects, including the practical utility of the data and alternatives to minimize burdens, such as automated collection methods.

Perspectives from Key Players and Precedents

The proposal fits into a pattern of periodic adjustments to BEA surveys. In 2017, during the last major benchmark survey cycle, BEA similarly reviewed thresholds to adapt to economic changes. The Office of Management and Budget, which oversees federal information collections, has previously approved revisions to BEA forms under OMB Control Number 0608-0009, emphasizing efficiency.

Industry associations, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have historically advocated for streamlined reporting to encourage foreign investment. Conversely, academic researchers relying on BEA data for studies on globalization might push for maintaining broader coverage. The notice does not reference specific court cases but operates within the framework of administrative law, where agencies must justify changes through public notice and comment periods.

Political forces could influence the outcome, as foreign direct investment policies often intersect with trade agendas. While the notice is administrative, it occurs in a context where U.S. administrations have varied in their approach to international investment, from promotion to scrutiny amid geopolitical tensions.

In summary, BEA's proposal to elevate the BE-605 threshold seeks to optimize data collection amid evolving economic landscapes. Key takeaways include the potential for reduced burdens without compromising core statistical insights. Looking ahead, the public comment period ending March 16, 2026, will shape the final submission to OMB. Possible next steps involve incorporating feedback, which could lead to further refinements. Ongoing debates may center on balancing efficiency with comprehensive data needs, especially as foreign investment patterns shift with global events. Challenges include ensuring data accuracy in a dynamic economy, while opportunities exist for technological enhancements in reporting to sustain utility for users like policymakers and analysts.

Learn More

We are an education company, not a law firm. The information and content we provide is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make no representations, warranties, or guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of the content. It is important to always consult with a qualified attorney for specific legal counsel pertaining to your individual circumstances.

people ask

Need more help? Schedule a Call.

We love our system, and we know you will, too! We’d be happy to explain how our system works, which options you have available, and which of those options would be the most effective and affordable for your budget. We know your time is valuable, so feel free to use the link below to select a time that works best for you or your team to meet with one of our experts.

Book Now Subscribe Now Search Courses